Parliamentary Tensions: Leong Mun Wai’s Controversial Statements
On March 22, Leong Mun Wai, a Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP), stirred up the House by agreeing to disclose the names of six former Keppel executives. This revelation came amidst a heated exchange with Law and Home Affairs Minister K. Shanmugam.
The $5 Request and Court Investigations
In a surprising twist, Leong asked his colleague K.J. to lend him $5 during the discussion. This light-hearted moment quickly shifted as Shanmugam was questioned about the disclosure of Lee Hsien Yang and Lee Suet Fern’s names during a court investigation concerning potential false evidence. Leong claimed that Shanmugam had referenced the Parti Liyani case in his response, prompting the Minister to urge the public to distinguish between the two cases.
Leong defended his statements, asserting that Shanmugam’s comments were irrelevant and intended to mislead Parliament. Shanmugam, however, labelled Leong’s claims as “serious” and called for a retraction, arguing that it was inappropriate to suggest false motives.
Unparliamentary Conduct and Calls for Apology
The tension escalated as Shanmugam accused Leong of “unparliamentary” behaviour during their hour-long exchange. He pointed out that Leong had failed to raise his concerns in Parliament and instead took to Facebook to make “improper” statements. Shanmugam highlighted past incidents where Leong had also breached parliamentary decorum, urging him to apologise for his comments.
Shanmugam referenced Section 31(g) of the Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities Act, which protects the integrity of Parliament. This section prohibits anyone from making defamatory statements about members of Parliament. He emphasised the need to uphold the “paramountcy of Parliament” and safeguard its reputation.
Pattern of Behaviour and Social Media Scrutiny
In a Facebook post, Shanmugam noted that Leong had a history of inappropriate conduct, having apologised multiple times for his behaviour. The Minister pointed out a troubling pattern: Leong often makes false allegations, misstates facts, and behaves inappropriately in Parliament. He urged Leong to retract his Facebook post and offer an apology.
During the session, Shanmugam also questioned Leong about Lee Hsien Yang’s return to Singapore, highlighting their interactions on social media. Leong responded by advocating for fairness and equality before the law, asserting that Lee had “absconded.”
Implications for Workplace Conduct
This unfolding drama in Parliament raises important questions about behaviour in the workplace. It serves as a reminder for all of us to be vigilant and support one another. Maintaining professionalism and integrity is crucial, whether in Parliament or at our HDBs and hawker centres.
In conclusion, the recent events in Parliament underscore the need for accountability and respect within our institutions. As Singaporeans, let’s strive for a workplace culture that values honesty and collaboration.
For more insights on parliamentary conduct, check out the [Parliamentary Privileges and Immunities Act](https://www.parliament.gov.sg).